Thursday, March 6, 2008

ICL or ICC who is eviler?

Why are ICL players banned from International cricket?

If players are willing to put their domestic and international sides first, why can they not cash in during the off season.

Do cricket administracrats only take cash from their jobs, they don’t make money from consultancy, or with share port folios that may have companies in direct competition with their nations arrangements.

Any player who signs his life over to ICL and forgets about his country is a different matter.

But what about an English player who is not currently in the side.

If it is in his off season, should he not be allowed to play for any cricket league.

Where is the line drawn?

If Ponting wants to play in the Adolf Leagues of Germany, does he have to get the ICC to rubber stamp it?

Does Sean Ervine need official sanctioning to go into a chicken throwing contest?

Can KP enter the world’s biggest ass clown competition?

Let us not forget that the ICL is a bastard love child of some serious friends with benefits administrating from the BCCi about television rights.

Now they want to punish professional cricketers from cashing in on something that the ICC will cash in on.

If Cricket is professional, then shouldn’t professionals be able to ply their trade?

Players already need to run all personal sponsors past boards, next they will have to run the potential partners and sunscreen lotions by them, before application.

Will a player be forced from an International team for wearing Ray Bans instead of Oakleys?

How do we end this?

I suggest anarchy.

Street cricket is cooler anyway.

Who’s with me?

Take to the streets with your bats people.www.cricketwithballs.com "Sign our David Hussey petition"

No comments: