Tuesday, March 4, 2008

How Sachin turned it around

India’s enthralling victory in the final CB Series is a fitting end to a summer in which they have battled fiercely with Australia, matching them from the second Test onwards. Controversially opting against selecting any of Dravid, Ganguly and Laxman for this series, India’s triumph was one of youthful vigour, testament to their aptitude for the fight and their mental resilience. At the centre of it all, however, was Sachin Tendulkar.

There is so much to admire about Tendulkar, forced to handle fame when just a boy yet a man who has retained humility and decency whilst playing international cricket for 18 years at a phenomenal level. In so much as it is possible, the pressures of batting for a billion do not appear to have greatly affected him. Yet what is too eagerly overlooked is the manner in which the master has reinvigorated himself so spectacularly after what was a form slump that appeared terminal.

That is not overstating it. Over three years from April 2004, Tendulkar’s returns in Tests declined alarmingly, although his diminishing returns were hid by some gorging on Bangladesh. The figures say it all: a paltry average of 28 over 22 Tests against the major nations. His one-day international figures were much better but, even so, there was a danger that Tendulkar would damage memories of his resplendent strokeplay with these years of rather undignified struggle.

The nadir was reached with a dire World Cup: a painful 26-ball seven against Bangladesh contributed to India needing a win against Sri Lanka just to qualify for the Super Eights. As he came out to bat, with his side teetering at 43/2, Cricinfo asked: “Is this going to be the defining moment?” Three balls later, we knew the answer: bowled for nought, his sad trudge back to the Pavillion seemed to betray a man who could no longer live up to his reputation. Brilliant innings of yore were an increasingly distant memory.

Yet somehow, Tendulkar found a way to turn it around, beginning with a pair of 90s against South Africa in a low-key ODI series in Ireland. Slowly and almost imperceptibly, Tendulkar began to rediscover the panache that characterised his brilliance of the 1990s. In the Tests in England, he patently appeared a great player wrestling against the advancing years; he played some vital knocks, though his strike-rate of 43 was indicative of strokeplay less dashing than had once been the case. The following ODIs marked further steps on the road to recovery; Tendulkar seemed free of burden â€" until he reached the 90s, when the weight of expectation would descend once more upon him.

Against Pakistan, he was superb â€" but the qualifier was he was playing against a modest attack in docile conditions. Could he do it against the best once more, and in Australia at that? Oh yes he could. Tendulkar seemed a man more at ease with his ability than for some time; his movement was as quick as in his youth; and the joie de vivre was back. His batting encompassed the élan of his youth and the nous that comes with being 34, as he masterfully adapted his game depending on the circumstances. The results were phenomenal: two scores of over 150, a series average of 70 and, tellingly, a strike-rate as high as 65. Australia will be aware of the onerous task facing them on their return tour in the autumn.

The majesty of Tendulkar's batting is there for all to see. His two innings in the finals â€" 117* to lead India to a comfortable run-chase, and 91 when India were batting first in the second game â€" were paced to perfection. He batted with a wonderful fusion of freedom and responsibility, and Australia had no answer. A year ago many believed the contrary â€" and with good reason â€" but Tendulkar's looks set to remain in international cricket for some time yet. He has rediscovered the joy he found batting in his youth. This, allied with his copious experience, mean that, once more, Sachin Tendulkar’s wicket is the most prized in the game â€" and don’t Australia know it.

Dear Jimmy

(I am starting this post with 48 off 36 balls to go. )

Dear Jimmy,

Congratulations on a beautifully crafted innings.

I have oft compared the to an Ian Harvey.

That was wrong of me, you are much much more than Ian.

You are sunshine on a cloudy day.

You are the lost bourbon bottle that is found after a break up with the missus.

You are so wonderful, to me.

And yet you grace life with a fore head so low your eyebrows get nervous.

Jimmy let me count the ways you entertain me.

Slower balls.

Low Forehead.

Wacky dismissals.

Steady quicker than it looks bowling.

Catfish.

General disregard for how you look on the cricket field.

Batting like a drunken cowboy.

Even your name Jimmy, Hopes.

Its not Jimmy does, or Jimmy tries, its Jimmy Hopes, and as we all know they spring eternal.

With you at the crease our victory is practically assured.

Sure we don’t deserve to win, but since when has that stopped us.

Eternally yours.

(Uncle) J rodwww.cricketwithballs.com "Sign our David Hussey petition"

the wrap up

India are young, hungry and full of piss n vinegar.

Australia are old, jaded and lacking loads of Viagra.

The aussies were probably the best side in this series.

But India were by far the best team in the finals.

So there is something there for everyone.

India fans will be excited.

Australian fans will be confused.

Gilly is gone, well done sir.

Hogg is gone, please exit through back door when no one is looking mister.

Sachin may never dance on our grass again.

And Kerry’s tournament is going the way of the Dodo bird and Britney Spears.

With Kerry’s series passing, and underwear cricket taking over, you must thank that one day cricket is going the way of the dodo bird and Kerry Packer as well.

But Indian fans will still jump up and down with glee, gay in the knowledge that there side beat Australia.

And Australian fans will jump and down with glee, happy in the knowledge that they won’t have to hear the Indians whinge in Australia for a couple of years.

Cricket fans won’t really care about a one day tournament being won by India, since the England won it last year.

Hardly a great form line.www.cricketwithballs.com "Sign our David Hussey petition"

Monday, March 3, 2008

the second final

Due to severe lack of interest, work, and the fact our antenna seems broken at my new place, i will not be bothering to wqatch the game today.

I may listen via the wireless.

Feel free to comment on any part of the game in the comments though.

Especially on things you think will make me chuckle.

IE Sharma getting hit on the adams apple.

Or the Australian middle order batting correctly.www.cricketwithballs.com "Sign our David Hussey petition"

how i sees em 2

Steve Waugh â€" he is one of those army sergeants no one wants around unless something goes wrong. The generals don’t like him, and the young privates feel weird drinking around him.

Ricky Ponting â€" bats like he is Paul Newman. Walks around like a self aware 19 year old.

Saurav Ganguly â€" bats like a stuck up private school kid who has had caviar in his play pen. When its easy, he’s good, when its hard he’s on the golf course.

Rahul Dravid â€" fights at the crease like a human fighting off the giant insect alien hordes coming to destroy earth.

Inzamam Ul Haq â€" bats as if time is not a construct.

Mohammad Yousuf â€" bats like a tight ass. You get the feeling every run is a vital cog in his self esteem.

Brian Lara â€" plays the game like he is the most talented kid in the park.www.cricketwithballs.com "Sign our David Hussey petition"

Only victory is acceptable for England

England have the nucleus of a pretty good Test side, but the time for excuses has long gone. New Zealand were twice thrashed when they toured South Africa recently, and are much worse at Tests than one-day internationals, suffering from a lack of potency - magnified by the departure of Shane Bond - and from a brittle middle-order. If England are to have any hope of regaining their number two ranking any time soon, they should win this series by at least a 2-0 margin.

In theory, England’s pace attack should prove decisive. Matthew Hoggard and Ryan Sidebottom, in conditions that should be very conducive to their brand of swing, will be eager to attack a line-up in which there are major deficiencies. Their canny swing, subtle variations and consistency will test the techniques of the Kiwi batsmen to the hilt. And, if Steve Harmison can find his groove on pitches that are expected to offer some bounce, New Zealand’s scorecards could resemble those in South Africa, when they failed to pass 200 in four innings, in which case Monty Panesar, who needs a good series, may be marginalised.

With the bat, the controversial selection of Andrew Strauss, who had done nothing whatsoever to merit a recall, means there will be a re-jigging of the batting order. The promising Vaughan-Cook opening pair will be persisted with, and Strauss will bat at three, for the first time in his Test career. He could be a bad series away from being dropped on a more permanent basis although he played reassuringly well in making 104 in the last warm-up game and his technical flaws should not be over-exposed by a fairly toothless attack. It is led by Chris Martin, a worthy and experienced bowler but averaging over 35 if Bangladesh and Zimbabwe are excluded. Daniel Vettori is a brilliant ODI bowler, but is perhaps a little over-rated in Tests, and claimed just three wickets in South Africa.

Ian Bell will, correctly, bat above Paul Collingwood. It is a wise move because, ultimately, Bell should be a better Test batsman than Collingwood, while, as his one-day pyrotechnics showed, Collingwood may be the better man to bat with the tail. Either way, against moderate opposition Bell should be looking to make a hundred â€" and a big one at that. Kevin Pietersen should enjoy the bowling providing he manages to keep his ego in check, particularly against Vettori.

As so often, however, all eyes will be on England’s number seven. Tim Ambrose will be making his debut in almost as low-key a setting as Test cricket allows. It is almost unanimously agreed that his keeping is a significant improvement upon that of Matt Prior. His batting, previously his weak suit, improved to the point that he averaged 45 in Division One of the championship, as well as 70 in the Friends Provident Trophy, last season. From what I know, Ambrose appears to be the best man for the gloves in the Test side. He has an important role to play as England begin the road to recovery after a dire run of Test form that has seen them win just two of their last eight series.

let the die decide

Ricky is angry.

Ricky only gets angry when he loses, or his integrity, which is obviously beyond contention in any area, is questioned.

His anger caused him to kick his team mates in the back side.

Which is code for, no shower play.

What must be hurting Ricky is that its his boys who are letting him down.

The bowlers are doing a pretty good job.

But the batsmen look hit or miss.

If the runs don’t come from the top of the tree, the tree falls over.

The partnerships have all but evaporated and the team looks a little ginger.

This has happened many times before, including the 2003 world cup.

So it is not panic stations just yet.

What exactly is a panic station? Who patrols it, and where do they have them?

It’s hard to know who if anyone should be replaced, Gilly is going, Hayden is looking ok, Ricky is very miss, not so much hit. Clarke has been the best this series, Hussey only makes runs on wickets the others can’t handle, and Roy seems to have forgotten how to be Roy.

They all look a bit stale at the moment.

I suggest a random dropping.

I just finished a book called the dice man.

If he were a selector he would assign each batsmen a number and roll the die to decide who to @ss.

Seems more logical than most selections.

Cricket is random anyway, we play on grass (well we used to), the weather and toss decide fates and no one knows where most quicks are trying to bowl.

So why not chuck down the die and see how it lies.

It’s only one day cricket anyway.www.cricketwithballs.com "Sign our David Hussey petition"